Impact of predators Posted Thursday, April 10, 2008
SIR, – Further to your story (March 28) on ravens attacking newborn lambs in Strathspey, and an RSPB Scotland spokesman’s quoted comment that he would find it “very hard to believe” that so many lambs could be killed by these predators, I challenge the RSPB to publish any evidence which allows the organisation to imply that the farmer is lying about his losses.

It is three years since an initial report by Stirling University set out the need for scientific research into the impact of predators on farm and wildlife, and the current very real suffering of these lambs and the impact on the farmers involved seems an opportune moment for any facts to be made public and the debate over the protection of these birds reopened.

The British Trust for Ornithology’s figures show that raven numbers have increased by 1,000% over 10 years, and my own members who know the hills and moorland better than any RSPB “experts” report an unprecedented number of dotterel, plover and ptarmigan nests destroyed by these predatory birds.

An absence of proper science and ill-informed comments such as those from the RSPB contribute to the public losing out on what could be a much richer mix of the moorland species.

Alex Hogg,

chairman, Scottish Gamekeepers Association,

Arran Business Centre,

Arran Road, Perth.

Time to rethink outdated wildlife protection policy Posted Thursday, April 10, 2008
Time to rethink outdated wildlife protection policy

View GalleryGraphic pictures of sheep pecked to death by ravens prompted your rural affairs editor, Dan Buglass, to call for more balance in the countryside (report, 7 April). I can only echo his views. The recent attacks on sheep are visually shocking, and their financial consequences easily assessed. However, a hidden threat exists beyond the lambing fields, out on our moors and uplands, where raven attacks on the eggs and chicks of ground-nesting birds such as the plover, the dotterel and the pt
Vast sums are spent every year in the uplands in the name of conservation or, on grouse moors, to bring high-value tourism to remote parts of Scotland. Unfortunately, the pictures we as gamekeepers could take of broken eggshells would not tell as dramatic a story as a mutilated newborn lamb, and despite our strongest arguments, applications for licences to control ravens for wildlife reasons are never granted.

Gamekeepers care about their livestock as much as farmers do and, like the sheep farmer, we find it heart-breaking to witness the waste of young life and our year's work. The general public lose out too on what would be a richer mix of the moorland species.

Farmers, shepherds and gamekeepers make up the majority of the fragile community in Scotland's isolated glens, and we believe our livelihoods are under threat from a dated protection policy which has seen raven numbers explode by 1,000 per cent in ten years. It is time for government to reassess priorities and give our people and our wildlife a chance.

ALEX HOGG

Chairman, Scottish Gamekeepers Association

Arran Road, Perth

General Licence Update Posted Tuesday, April 8, 2008
GENERAL LICENCES FOR CONTROL OF BIRD SPECIES IN SCOTLAND

Background
General Licences are issued on an annual basis by the Scottish Government to permit activities which would otherwise be illegal under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. These licences apply only to birds.

Under European law, all birds are protected. Some are then allowed to be “hunted” under national legislation. Other species are allowed to be controlled for specific purposes only (such as the protection of crops, livestock and foodstuffs, conservation of wild birds, prevention of the spread of disease etc.) under the General Licences. It is essential that anyone operating under these licences complies fully with the law, because breaches of their conditions could affect their future renewal.

The 2008 Licences contain some changes that everyone must be aware of. These are contained in the following notes.

Scottish General Licences 2008
You don’t have to apply for a General Licence, but you are required by law to abide by the conditions of the licence that you are operating under. You can find the full conditions on the Scottish Government website at

www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Environment/Wildlife-Habitats/16330/general-licences

Most SGA members will operate under the three following licences noted below:

Licence SGGL No.1/2008 – which allows you to kill or take certain birds for the conservation of wild birds
Licence SGGL No.2/2008 – allowing you to kill or take birds in order to prevent serious damage to livestock, foodstuffs for livestock, crops, vegetables and fruit
Licence SGGL No.3/2008 – to protect public health, public safety and prevent the spread of disease

General Conditions
All three of the licences mentioned have common features:

• You must read and understand the licence.
• You must be satisfied that non-lethal controls are either ineffective or impractical.
• Anyone convicted of a wildlife crime cannot use the General Licences until their conviction is considered to be “spent”. Such individuals may nevertheless apply to the Scottish Government for a specific licence.
• Shooting with any firearm, including semi-automatic firearms, shotguns or air weapons is permitted.

Cage Traps – General Conditions
All three of the licences contain some general provisions about cage traps and Larsen traps:

• Every cage trap must be inspected at intervals of no more than 24 hours and such an inspection must be sufficient to detect the presence of any live or dead birds.
• Decoy birds must be provided with food, water, shelter and a perch. Any dead or sickly decoy bird must be immediately removed from a trap.
• When not in use, Larsen traps should be securely stored so as to prevent accidental use. Crow cage traps that cannot be removed must have the doors either removed or fixed open using a locked padlock.
• Any cage trap or Larsen trap used under the licences must have a tag attached which gives the telephone number of the local police wildlife crime coordinator. This tag will also carry a unique code which allows the police, and only the police, to identify the operator of the trap. This code will be given to you by the police wildlife crime coordinator for your area when you supply them details of your estate/farm/business, the locality, the name of the owner or factor and the name of the headkeeper. One code will be sufficient for all the Larsen traps or cage traps that you operate. Contact details for wildlife crime coordinators are given below:

Central Scotland Police
Insp Brian Sharkey.
Tel: 01786 456345
Brian.Sharkey@centralscotland.pnn.police.uk

Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary
Lorna Irving.
Tel: 0845 600 5701
Lorna.E.Irving@dg.pnn.police.uk

Fife Constabulary
Det. Sgt. Graeme Mitchell.
Tel: 01592 411907.
Graeme.Mitchell@fife.pnn.police.uk

Grampian Police
Tracy Forsyth.
Tel: 01224 307871 or 0845 600 5700.
Tracy.Forsyth@grampian.pnn.police.uk

Lothian and Borders Police
Constable Jim McGovern.
Tel: 0131 311 3517
James.McGovern@lbp.pnn.police.uk

Northern Constabulary
Mrs May Macpherson
Tel: 01854 613872
May.macpherson@northern.pnn.police.uk

Strathclyde Police
Joe Connelly.
Tel: 0141 532 6885.
joe.connelly@strathclyde.pnn.police.uk

Tayside Police
Alan Stewart
Tel: 01738 892650.
alan.stewart@tayside.pnn.police.uk



Key Points

• You are not required to carry a copy of the licences.
• You must have the authority of the landowner or occupier of shooting rights before you can utilise the general licences.
• Your prime objective must meet one of the criteria for which the licences are issued: conserving wild birds, preventing serious damage to livestock, foodstuffs for livestock, crops, vegetables and fruit or to protect public health, public safety and prevent the spread of disease.
• There is no legal obligation to have tried non-lethal control methods such as proofing or scaring before conducting lethal control, only to be satisfied that non-lethal methods are ineffective or impracticable.

In this respect, the following points are worth considering:

 Pigeons are a highly mobile species and target vulnerable crops as and when they ripen and can vary their flightlines throughout the day. It would be ineffective and impractical to set up any stationary deterrent such as a scarecrow or scaregun as the pigeons would merely move field.
 Birds that routinely damage crops in the area may be distributed over such a large area that is ineffective and impractical to shoot them on site or employ non-lethal methods
 Corvids are highly intelligent and quickly become used to static or mechanical scaring techniques, which therefore become ineffective and impractical. Because of this shooting, or the use of static or mobile cage traps, are effective methods of control for territorial birds such as crow, jackdaw, jay, magpie and rook.



Update Posted Monday, March 31, 2008
General Licence
Although the bulk of the General Licence will remain the same after 1st April, there are a number of points that still give the SGA cause for concern.

First of all, we are concerned about the condition that anyone convicted under the relevant wildlife Acts is banned from using the General Licence (although they may apply to the Scottish Government for a specific licence). Without seeking in any way to undermine the important task of cracking down on serious wildlife crime, it appears to us that the most minor of convictions could prevent a Keeper from operating under General Licence and potentially therefore, restrict the ability to carry out profession. We have written to the Environment Minister to query whether this is truly intended.

We also question the way in which the ‘self-service’ coding system on Larsen and Cage traps has been introduced. It would appear that the Police made proposals for this which we have had no chance to comment on or influence in the run-up to the 1st April start date. We are now aware that the Police seem prepared to implement a lead-in time before charges are brought against individuals who fail to comply with these new requirements. Again, we have written to seek clarification on a practical lead-in.

We will update on any response from the Minister.

Snaring
The time-table for introduction of the snaring requirements set out in the Environment Minister’s announcement to Scottish Parliament in February depends on the progress of legislation. We expect this to take between 1 and 2 years to complete. However, members of the cross-industry group (SGA, BASC, SRPBA, SEBG and SCA) believe that certain requirements can be implemented sooner. We are keen to do this to support the Minister’s decision to maintain snaring, which could so easily have gone against us. The elements that we believe can be introduced soon are:

• Safety stops on snares
• Development of a joint code of practice based on current SGA, BASC and G & WCT documents, for release in summer 2008
• New snaring rules proposed (snare action to be checked, anchoring requirements, prohibited locations for snares - on posts, over water, on planks, fences) to be included within the joint code of practice.

Other requirements such as the introduction of ID tags on snares, advisory signs and training accreditation will require discussion between the cross-industry group and Scottish Government. As these are likely to fall in line with the Legislation, we expect that it will take between 1 and 2 years from now before they come into force. We will update members and indicate any time-table as soon as we know.

Tail docking
We are co-operating with BASC to set up a petition to run this Summer calling for a change in the law to allow for the tail docking of working dogs. Alongside this, recent research in support of docking and ongoing research to be undertaken by the Royal Veterinary College may help to back up public support.


SGA Office

AGM at Perth Race Course, Perth Posted Monday, March 3, 2008
The AGM will be held on Friday 7th March at Perth Race Course.

Registration at 10am SGA Members only.

Many different and interesting speakers...look forward to seeing you there.

Please phone Perth office on 01738 587515 to reserve a seat.

Core Paths Consultation Posted Monday, March 3, 2008
Perth & Kinross Council are sending out letters with regard to their Core Path Consultation, please respond to this by 31st March. You can also download this consultation and view maps of proposed core paths on theri website,

http://www.pkc.gov.uk

Snaring update Posted Thursday, February 28, 2008
Snaring update

We are aware that there’s a discussion forum running on the Snaring statement by the Minister, Mike Russell, to Scottish Parliament yesterday (20.2.08). To recap on his statement, he announced:

• Compulsory fitting of crimped safety stops
• Compulsory fitting of ID tags on snares which will allow identification of their owner by the authorities, but not by casual passers-by.
• The action of a snare must be checked before it is set
• Snares which are not staked in place must be fixed with an anchor that cannot be dragged away
• Prohibiting the setting of snares on posts, over water courses, on planks or fences
• Specifying that areas where snaring is taking place are clearly marked with signs.

The Minister also intends to bring forward legislation which would make it an offence to tamper with a lawfully set snare. He also wants a new land management industry accreditation scheme with the aim that within a fixed period everyone who sets a snare will have received training in best practice and the law, with the intention that eventually no-one without training will be allowed to set a snare.


Over the last few months, the SGA has been involved in the debate and discussions about snaring that led up to the announcement. Of course we see, and have pointed out the obvious practical issues in the Minister’s statement. However, we have a Government in power at the moment that is prepared to consider land management issues, and this has allowed us to have discussions that were unthinkable with the previous administration. We know that there is a long way ahead of us, but we will work with the Minister to get things right with snaring and other vital issues that affect our work.

Snaring update Posted Thursday, February 21, 2008
Snaring update

We are aware that there’s a discussion forum running on the Snaring statement by the Minister, Mike Russell, to Scottish Parliament yesterday (20.2.08). To recap on his statement, he announced:

• Compulsory fitting of crimped safety stops
• Compulsory fitting of ID tags on snares which will allow identification of their owner by the authorities, but not by casual passers-by.
• The action of a snare must be checked before it is set
• Snares which are not staked in place must be fixed with an anchor that cannot be dragged away
• Prohibiting the setting of snares on posts, over water courses, on planks or fences
• Specifying that areas where snaring is taking place are clearly marked with signs.

The Minister also intends to bring forward legislation which would make it an offence to tamper with a lawfully set snare. He also wants a new land management industry accreditation scheme with the aim that within a fixed period everyone who sets a snare will have received training in best practice and the law, with the intention that eventually no-one without training will be allowed to set a snare.


Over the last few months, the SGA has been involved in the debate and discussions about snaring that led up to the announcement. Of course we see, and have pointed out the obvious practical issues in the Minister’s statement. However, we have a Government in power at the moment that is prepared to consider land management issues, and this has allowed us to have discussions that were unthinkable with the previous administration. We know that there is a long way ahead of us, but we will work with the Minister to get things right with snaring and other vital issues that affect our work.

Snaring Posted Thursday, February 21, 2008
The SGA Committee has fought hard for retention of snaring as an essential tool for keepering. Mike Russell, the Environment Minister, is due to make a statement in early February 08. At the moment, it is possible he will recommend the retention of snaring, but with a number of restrictions. The restrictions might be standard construction of the snares, or estate ID on snares.

Although the Minister’s recommendations carry weight, the Rural Development Committee within Parliament may still review them. Equally, a Private Member’s Bill might be introduced. Either route might take a totally different view from the Minister’s proposals.

It is VITAL that MSPs understand why we need to retain snaring as a tool of our work. Please make every effort to contact your local MSP to press for retention of snaring, otherwise we run the risk of an outright ban.

Snaring Posted Thursday, January 17, 2008
The SGA Committee has fought hard for retention of snaring as an essential tool for keepering. Mike Russell, the Environment Minister, is due to make a statement in early February 08. At the moment, it is possible he will recommend the retention of snaring, but with a number of restrictions. The restrictions might be standard construction of the snares, or estate ID on snares.

Although the Minister’s recommendations carry weight, the Rural Development Committee within Parliament may still review them. Equally, a Private Member’s Bill might be introduced. Either route might take a totally different view from the Minister’s proposals.

It is VITAL that MSPs understand why we need to retain snaring as a tool of our work. Please make every effort to contact your local MSP to press for retention of snaring, otherwise we run the risk of an outright ban.

Strategy for Wild Deer in Scotland Posted Thursday, January 10, 2008
‘Strategy for Wild Deer in Scotland’ from the Deer Commission, a response must be in by the 1st February 2008. We urge all interested members to ring the deer commission in Stirling (01786 446 282) or in Inverness (01463 725 000) for a copy of the consultation document (also available on the DCS website as a download) and send in comments on the strategy and any other points you wish to raise.

Raffle 2007 Posted Thursday, December 20, 2007
This years winner of the HONDA ATV Raffle is Bill Andrew of Ardrossan, Mr Andrew was absolutely delighted and never expected to win a prize. The second prize, an original oil painting by Elizabeth Halstead was won by Mr Paul McRae of Buckie. The raffle has once again been tremendous, a total of £8400 was raised and The SGA would like to thank everyone who helped raising these funds, and most importantly HONDA UK who very kindly donated the ATV to the SGA.

The threat of Bluetongue Disease - Deer Posted Friday, October 26, 2007
The threat of Bluetongue Disease - Peter Green Honorary Veterinary Adviser, The British Deer Society

The current appearance of Bluetongue Disease in Suffolk has great significance for both the farming and wildlife populations of the UK. Bluetongue is a well recognised disease of ruminant animals in many parts of the world, but the UK has always remained free of the infection, although it has affected large areas of northern Europe since 2005.

The disease is caused by a virus and spread by biting midges. It is not infectious from animal to animal, but depends upon the insect vector to transmit the virus from one animal to another in much the same way as malaria is transmitted from person to person. A wide range of ruminants may be infected by the virus, but the response varies considerably from species to species. Of the domestic animals, sheep are the most seriously affected, with severe disease in adult sheep causing high mortality. Signs include swelling of the head, high fever, nasal discharge, lameness, pneumonia and interference with the blood supply to the tongue and lips, which turn blue or even black. In milder outbreaks, clinical signs may be less severe but abortion, stillbirth and weak, fading or deformed lambs occur. Cattle are usually either only very mildly affected, or are not affected at all - although the current disease in Suffolk was first recognised in a cow; other cattle as well as sheep are now being tested. The type of virus in Suffolk has been identified as BTV8, which is the same strain as in the recent outbreaks near the English Channel and North Sea coasts in Europe. It has probably arrived with a wind borne midge.

Some parts of the southern USA have continual and persistent infection, as do some parts of Mediterranean southern Europe and many other sub-tropical agricultural economies are plagued by the disease. The virus belongs to a closely related group of viruses that includes the virus causing African Horse Sickness and a severe disease of deer called Epizootic Haemorrhagic Disease [EHD]; in fact, the deer virus and the sheep virus are so closely related that some scientists believe that they are simply variations of the same virus. Others believe that the viruses are distinct, but very similar. The deer disease [EHD] causes serious and fatal signs in white tailed deer in many parts of the USA and Canada. Outbreaks sometimes kill hundreds of animals, usually mostly white tails, but in severe incidents mule deer and pronghorn antelopes are also affected and may die. The clinical signs in deer are the same as the signs in sheep with Bluetongue. Rather perversely white tailed deer are also the most seriously affected by true Bluetongue virus, leading to great confusion in southern States of the USA where both diseases are endemic. Red deer, fallow deer, muntjac and roe deer are all potential hosts of the Bluetongue virus and in experimental inoculations with EHD all four species developed a period of infection, with multiplication and shedding of the virus, but none developed serious disease.

The vector of the disease in southern Europe is a biting midge Culicoides imicola. This insect is not normally present in the UK and present climatic conditions mean that it is unlikely to become established. If temperatures fall below 12oC for periods of time the midge cannot survive and persistent periods of temperatures higher than 15oC are required for the virus to multiply within the insect. It is clear, however, that the midge has extended its range northwards across Europe in recent years. and the prolonged heat wave of July 2006 was an ideal breeding opportunity. This particular midge species would not survive for long in the UK, but it is possible that animals could have been bitten by the infected midges before they disappeared. Stalkers [especially those in the north] will be only too aware that we have several species of aggressive biting midge, some of which are other closely related Culicoides species and DEFRA has pointed out that these insects could potentially become vectors of the Bluetongue virus.

Almost all Eurasian deer species are members of the subfamily Cervinae, which contains species like the red deer, sika, fallow, axis, the rusa and swamp deer. Wapiti, or American elk are also classified within this sub family and just like red and sika, can hybridise with European red deer. Most of the New World deer like the north American white tailed, the mule deer and the South American brocket deer, marsh deer, pampas deer and pudu are members of a different sub family of deer, the Odocoilinae. Bluetongue virus appears to be much more able to become established and to cause disease in the Odocoilinae deer [for instance the white tailed] than in the Cervinae species. The roe deer is a member of the Odocoilinae, not the Cervinae and is therefore much more closely related to American white tails than to British red or fallow. Although there has been a little work with EHD virus in roe, not a great deal is known about the pathogenesis of true Bluetongue in roe, which is generally a deer species of northern latitudes where Bluetongue has not traditionally occurred. If the disease becomes endemic in areas where roe deer and farm animals live closely together, the roe may become symptomless hosts of the virus or may suffer actual disease. This is speculation, but the national bodies with specific deer interests such as the British Deer Society and the Deer Initiative are closely monitoring the situation and will endeavour to keep web pages up dated.

For the time being, DEFRA is investigating the Suffolk case by means of blood testing to determine whether the virus has spread. The UK Bluetongue Control Strategy is now being implemented; an outbreak will not be declared unless it is shown that the virus is circulating. Protection Zones and Surveillance Zones are much larger in the case of Bluetongue and the disease control is principally directed at elimination of the vector insects, although slaughter of infected livestock is a control option. The appearance of the disease at the end of the summer, rather than at the beginning, gives some hope that the infection will be limited and that the virus will not overwinter in the UK.

Deer stalkers and managers are advised to continue to be vigilant for signs of disease in deer, either those monitored in deer parks and farms or culled wild animals taken as part of routine management. The national restrictions on stalking because of Foot and Mouth Disease continue to be in force - shooting of deer is permitted and carcases for human consumption may be moved, but all non-edible parts of the carcase, including gralloch and heads may not be moved off the premises unless they are entering the officially licensed fallen stock collection schemes. Should deer with signs of disease be encountered, veterinary advice may be sought through the offices of the British Deer Society and The Deer Initiative and details of local DEFRA offices may be found in all BT telephone directories.

Peter Green Honorary Veterinary Adviser
The British Deer Society

DEFRA Bluetongue update 24th September : Posted Wednesday, September 26, 2007
second cow positive for Bluetongue in Suffolk
A second cow has tested positive for Bluetongue on the same farm in Baylham, Suffolk, where the disease was first discovered on 22 September. This is not sufficient evidence to confirm an outbreak of Bluetongue as it cannot yet be demonstrated that the disease is circulating between the local animal and midge populations.
The cow was culled today as it may have posed a threat to the other animals on the premises. This is because it could have potentially provided a source of infection for the local midge population. We continue to test the remaining animals on the premises and surrounding area.
It remains essential for animal keepers to practice the highest standards of biosecurity, remain vigilant for disease and report any suspicions immediately. Livestock owners should examine their livestock twice a day

Bluetongue Update 16:30 25th September 2007: Posted Wednesday, September 26, 2007
Defra has confirmed that a third animal has tested positive for Bluetongue. This is on a premises near Lowestoft. In the light of this, it has been agreed that it would not be appropriate to allow farm to farm movements in the area surrounding the premises from 3.30pm today. This area is Norfolk and Suffolk.
Essex is also considered to be at risk of Bluetongue, but as it is also in the Foot and Mouth Disease Risk Area, farm-to-farm movements would not be permitted in any case.
At this stage, there is not sufficient evidence to confirm an active outbreak of Bluetongue by the internationally-recognised definition. It cannot yet be demonstrated that the disease is circulating or alternatively is the result of a single incursion of infected midges from abroad.
Update 14.00 25th September 2007:
Defra has identified, from 3.30pm Tuesday 25 September, a Bluetongue Temporary Area while surveillance is carried out to determine whether the virus is circulating. This area encompasses Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire, Leicestershire, Cambridgeshire, Norfolk, Suffolk, Northamptonshire and Bedfordshire, and covers those additional areas which could be included in any further movement controls should an outbreak of Bluetongue be confirmed.
Bluetongue Temporary Area: The same movements as in the FMD Risk Zone will apply For further information and map: www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/diseases/fmd/movements/index.htm

Members change of address notification Posted Friday, September 21, 2007
Members who are moving house or have moved recently, could they please inform the SGA Secretary. Many magazines have been returned by the Post Office. We like to make sure that members receive their copies and also their membership cards.

Getting the balance right in our countryside Posted Friday, September 21, 2007
By Mike Russell

Last Updated: 12:01am BST 19/09/2007

Last month, when I announced some new strategies for focusing public attention and official sanction on individuals who poison birds of prey, your columnist, Alan Cochrane, claimed I was "grandstanding".

Tomorrow, when I launch an innovative project which aims to demonstrate how financially viable grouse moor management can be combined with good environmental practice and the protection of raptors, I hope that I might get a more positive response particularly as the actions, are - in my mind - not only complementary but essential.

There is, and can be, no excuse for murdering iconic birds of prey such as the golden eagle. In this worst-ever year for wildlife crime in Scotland - not a statistic to be proud of - it is appropriate that the new government reminds those responsible (whether they be landowners, land agents, land managers, tenants or gamekeepers) that the crime will be treated seriously, that much effort will go into its investigation and prosecution and that the legal sanctions available to the courts will be salutary.

I shall be making that point again when I address Scotland's wildlife crime officers at their annual seminar next month.

Scotland and its diverse landscape would be much the poorer if we turned a blind eye to environmental vandalism and criminality, and we would also lose much in terms of our international reputation.

It would also, frankly, be wrong and immoral to tolerate such wanton destruction of such beautiful creatures. But there is no contradiction in saying that whilst still being determined to encourage a range of profitable and sustainable countryside industries, including game management.

I made that point at a number of very muddy game fairs during the very wet summer and I went further, stressing to the many gamekeepers, landowners and country sports enthusiasts I met that finding a way to make that happen was not only possible but, I believed, was also achievable. One way to do that is to make sure that land managers and environmentalists alike understand that their current war of words (and sometimes actions) is counterproductive and indeed positively harmful to the cause they espouse.

Neither side can win outright, and if (for example) extreme environmentalism was to lead to the end of grouse shooting in Scotland, then the moors would not become safe havens for a rich variety of wildlife, but would instead - as Langholm, in the Borders, has shown without management - become more and more denuded of diversity.

When, between 1992 and 1997, Langholm Moor was managed as a grouse moor which gave full protection to raptors, numbers of grouse declined and raptors rose.

Once that had happened the gamekeepers were withdrawn, but instead of flourishing, the raptors went into decline. In fact, it would appear that other bird species were badly affected too.

Today, this important moor is actually in danger of failing the objectives of its designation as a site of special scientific interest, not because it is used as a grouse moor, but because it is no longer worked and managed in that way.

A similar example of the danger of a simplistic approach can be found in parts of the Western Isles, where attempts to drive out traditional agriculture led not to the enhancement of the shoreline environment, but to its degradation. The interaction of cattle with the rest of the ecology of the area was what maintained its unique nature.

Yet the Western Isles can also be used to illustrate the other side of the argument. The problem of goose damage to crops and land in Islay, for example, has been resolved (albeit at times uneasily and less satisfactorily than in some other parts of the Hebrides) by transparent constructive agreement between environmental organisations and local farmers which results in fair compensation for damage done.

Birds and people can live in harmony - on that island at least- for killing every goose that flew into a gun-sight would neither solve the problem nor respect the modern demands of our environment and our society. Likewise - and more so - the killing of birds of prey. Islay and Langholm, in their different ways, suggest a way can be found - or at least might be found with enough goodwill and practical co-operation - for land managers and environmentalists to learn together how they can live together and achieve, together, their separate objectives.

The first Langholm project is now being replaced by a second project in which the Buccleuch Estates, Scottish Natural Heritage, the RSPB, GCT and others will attempt to find the right way forward and by so doing, hopefully achieve all their various aims including conservation and profit. They aim to do so by increasing grouse numbers and finding non-lethal ways of sustaining a viable raptor population. Many grouse moor owners and ornithologists will be watching what happens at Langholm with great interest.

It should also be watched by those who are keen to see an end to the sterile oppositionalism of some of the environmental debate. What works in Langholm - if it can be made to work - might well work elsewhere.

The key objective of government in Scotland in terms of rural development is to have a flourishing rural population. To do that we are going to need more, and more profitable, businesses.

Scotland is not full up and its landscape needs to be a place where people can earn a good living whilst always acting as sensitive guardians of a superb but fragile national asset.

Of course, many people who live in rural Scotland neither manage land nor protect birds. They know, however, that having both those things done well is essential to their enjoyment - and to the future - of the place they inhabit.

The Scottish Government knows that too, and is working with such a key aim firmly in mind. Working by patiently encouraging constructive compromise, but also working with a passionate concern for all the living things in our landscape - humans included.

Dogs in the Countryside course Posted Tuesday, September 18, 2007
Dogs in the Countryside course - Wednesday 17 October; Forestry Commission Glenmore Visitor Centre *; 09:45 - 16:45



The Cairngorms National Park is an area of scenic beauty, with an incredible natural and cultural heritage. It is by its very nature a special place for residents and visitors alike, most of whom wish to enjoy the area without imposing on others, or impacting on the heritage. Dog walking is one of the most visible and frequent year-round activities in the natural environment. However, sometimes people are not fully aware of the impact that their pets are having. This course aims to help countryside staff to develop effective practical approaches that help dog owners and dogs get the most from their visit to the countryside without upsetting other recreational users or disturbing and damaging wildlife.



Programme

The following topics will be discussed: -

Dogs in society – managing their owners
The rights and responsibilities of dog walkers
The land manager’s perspective
Site visit (looking at dog facilities, messages and management on site, including health and safety issues on approaching walkers with dogs)
Changing owners’ behaviour – an overview of initiatives and best practice
Improving owners’ control of and rapport with their dogs
Course facilitators

Tony Wilson, Vice-Chair of SCRA, and Stephen Jenkinson, Access and Countryside Management trainer and consultant will be delivering the course, with contributions from Cattie Anderson (SNH), Sue Hilder (NFUS) and a local ranger.



Course Fee

The course is aimed at rangers, game-keepers, farmers, outdoor instructors, and those who work for land based businesses, and who are likely to have to encounter dogs and their owners in the countryside, and the various issues this presents. The course is free of charge for people working in the Land Based Sector in the Cairngorms National Park.



Booking Procedure (*please note venue is the Forestry Commission Glenmore Visitor Centre, not Sport Scotland's Glenmore Lodge)

Places are limited to a maximum of 20. Already 12 places have been reserved, so booking is essential to secure a place. To book please phone or e-mail me as per my details below.



Kind regards



Kate

Kate Christie
Training Project Manager
Cairngorms National Park Authority
14 The Square
Grantown-on-Spey
PH26 3HG

Tel: 01479 870535
Fax: 01479 873527

Foot and Mouth Disease – Lifting of Restrictions on the Movement of Deer Carcases Posted Friday, September 14, 2007
Dear Sir / Madam,

Restrictions preventing the movement of deer carcases in Scotland following the case of Foot and Mouth in Surrey have now been lifted with immediate effect.

Whole or parts of a deer carcase can now be moved.

However, conditions apply to the movement of carcases as follows:

Any person transporting a deer carcase must:

- 1) Do so in a drip proof container or vehicle

- 2) Clean and disinfect the vehicle as soon as possible after unloading.

Restrictions to the number of people who can go stalking still apply as follows:

A maximum of three guests accompanying estate staff to shoot deer can be done without a licence. Shooting in larger groups can only be carried out under licence and licences are not currently being issued. When available these can be obtained from your local animal health office - Ayr 01292 291350; Galashiels 01896 758806; Inverness 01463 253098; Inverurie 01467 626300; Perth 01738 602211.

For further information please go to the Deer Commission for Scotland website – www.dcs.gov.uk

If you have any other queries or questions please contact:

Erlend Barclay

Communications Officer

Deer Commission for Scotland

Great Glen House

Leachkin Road

Inverness

IV3 8NW

Tel: 01463 725000

Direct dial: 01463 725366

Fax: 01463 725048

* erlend.barclay@dcs.gov.uk.

www.dcs.gov.uk

Moorland and Management: Developing the Dialogue Posted Tuesday, September 11, 2007
9th October, Invercauld Arms Hotel, Braemar
10th October, Duke of Gordon Hotel, Kingussie
3:30pm – 9.00pm
Free of charge training event delivered by the Land Based Business Training Project and the Cairngorms Awareness and Pride Project

Heather moorland is a valuable asset for tourism and recreation in the Park, and about 40% of the National Park is managed moorland. The aim of this event is to raise awareness and understanding, through a moorland walk and discussion, of the important role that land managers play in protecting and enhancing the uplands within the National Park; to provide an opportunity for recreational users of the uplands in the Cairngorms, and others with an interest in these areas, to enter into discussion with land owners and land managers; and to identify the need and the opportunities to improve the management and condition of the uplands through joint working between different interests
Agenda
15:00 / 15:30 Registration & introduction

16:00 – 18:00 Estate visit (taking the form of a short walk led by The Heather Trust over heather moorland on Invercauld Estate on the 9th and Dunachton Estate on the 10th, stopping to discuss key issues that influence the management of the estate)
18:30 – 19:30 Light Evening Meal

19:00 Registration for the evening meeting
19:30 – 21:00 Panel Discussion, chaired by The Heather Trust. Issues discussed will include ticks, deer, grazing, access, muirburn and a panel will be asked to comment on them, with contributions from the floor. Panel members include representatives of the CNPA, SNH, RSPB, together with private landowners and land managers.
21:00 – Summing up - refreshments


Course Facilitators
The course will be facilitated by The Heather Trust. The event is aimed at people with an active interest in the uplands, including: local people, recreational users, farmers, landowners and gamekeepers. It is hoped to attract representatives from a wide range of interests. The course is free of charge.

Booking Procedure
Places are limited so please book in advance. To book contact Kate or Sam at CNPA, The Square, Grantown-on-Spey PH26 5HG Tel 01479 870 535/537email addresses: katechristie@cairngorms.co.uk or sammasson@cairngorms.co.uk.

Honda ATV Raffle 2007 Posted Monday, July 23, 2007
Honda UK have once again donated an ATV, this time it is the new TRX420FM in green. Raffle books will be posted out with your next copy of the Scottish Gamekeeper Magazine. We will also be selling raffle tickets at the forthcoming shows. Last year we raised over £8,500 which was tremendoud and those funds are very much needed to help keep the SGA moving forward.

Dates for your diary 2007 Posted Monday, July 23, 2007
The SGA will be at the following shows:
3 & 4 August Highland Filed Sports fair at Moy, Inverness-shire
18 & 19 August Galloway Country fair at Raehill's, St. Ann's, Moffat
1 & 2 September Countryside Festival at Glamis, Angus.

See you there,

LICENCE FOR ANNEX IV(a) PROTECTED SPECIES Posted Monday, June 25, 2007
Introduction

On February 15 2007 the Scottish Parliament passed a number of amendments to the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c) Regulations. One of these amendments requires that anyone who has a specimen of an animal listed on Annex IV(a) of the EU Habitats Directive must now have a licence to possess it.

Do you require a licence?

If you have a lawfully taken a wild animal, dead or alive, of the species listed on Annex IV(a), or any part of such an animal, taken since 1994, you need to apply for a licence. This will mainly apply to taxidermy specimens.

Details of all the species listed in Annex IV(a) of the Habitats Directive can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/nature_conservation/eu_enlargement/2004/habitats/annexiv_en.pdf

The full text of the amendment can be found at: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/scotland/ssi2007/20070080.htm

How to apply for a licence

As of May 1 2007 you need to apply for a licence from the appropriate authority if you have a specimen of a wild-taken Annex IV(a) species.

If the animal is in your possession for scientific, research or educational purposes, or else for the conservation of wild animals and wild birds you need to apply to Scottish Natural Heritage.

If the specimen is kept for any other purpose, e.g. taxidermy, you must apply to the Scottish Executive.

Licences will be issued to the individual and will cover all specimens listed in the application.

You should provide the appropriate authority (see below) with details of the specimen(s) you have in your possession, information on how and when you acquired them and any further evidence that would be useful. Please use the application form on the next page to apply for your Scottish Executive licence to keep a specimen for display.

Contacts

Species Licensing Team Tel: 0131 244 7381

Landscapes and Habitats Division

Area 1J South

Victoria Quay

Edinburgh

EH6 6QQ

If you require a licence to keep an Annex IV(a) specimen for scientific, research or educational purposes, or for the conservation of wild birds and animals please contact Scottish Natural Heritage at SNH Licensing Team, Great Glen House, Leachkin Road, Inverness, IV3 8NW. Tel: 01463 725000

Training Courses Gundog fieldwork for ‘beginners and juniors’ Posted Friday, June 22, 2007
The Gundog Club is pleased to announce the launch of its Grade Two training courses in Scotland.
Following the success of the Grade One courses, introduced in England and Scotland in March of this year, Grade Two courses have followed by popular demand. The first Grade Two course in Scotland will be held in Lanarkshire, and will start in July. Further courses are planned in Fife and the Borders.

Similar courses will run throughout the UK, and each will culminate in The Gundog Club’s Grade Two test.

The Gundog Club aims to introduce more gundog owners to the sport of gundog training, helping people channel their pet’s natural desires and talents into a useful and exciting activity. The new Grade Two courses will provide support for dog owners who have reached the standard of The Gundog Club’s Grade One Beginner field test, and who wish to continue follow The Gundog Club’s graded training scheme.

Taught only by Gundog Club Accredited Assessors, each course is accepting a maximum of six students for six weekly, one hour, sessions.
Over the six weeks, students will train their dogs in basic obedience and simple retrieving, in preparation for the Grade Two test, which will take place in the final week. Many students will have already completed a Grade One course, and others will have trained their dogs in basic obedience and simple retrieving themselves, and want further support in taking training to the next level. The Lanarkshire Grade Two course is amongst twenty gundog courses available to book online now, with more being added regularly.

For further information, visit www.thegundogclub.co.uk/Training/courses
, email admin@thegundogclub.co.uk , or telephone 01428 717529.

Part time office assistant Posted Thursday, June 21, 2007
Office Assistant Required
Part-time position based in Perth, working for a national membership Association. Hours are flexible and the applicant must be prepared to work extra hours as and when required. A sound knowledge of IT is important and an outgoing personality with excellent telephone and communication skills are essential.

Please send your CV with a covering letter to SGA, PO Box 7477, Perth, PH2 7YE or by email: sga1@btconnect.com
Closing Date: Wednesday 27th June 2007

2007 SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT ELECTION NEWS Posted Monday, May 14, 2007
2007 Scottish Parliament Election Results Posted Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Total MSPs
2007 2003
Party Total R C Total R C
Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party 17 13 4 18 15 3
Scottish Green Party 2 2 - 7 7 0
Scottish Labour 46 9 37 50 4 46
Scottish Liberal Democrats 16 5 11 17 4 13
Scottish National Party 47 26 21 27 18 9
Scottish Senior Citizens Unity Party - - - 1 1 -
Scottish Socialist Party - - - 6 6 0
Solidarity - - - - - -
Independents and other parties 1 1 - 3 1 2
R - Regional MSPs C - Constituency MSPs

To contact your MSP go to:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/msp/membersPages/index.htm


Aberdeen Central
MSP Elected Party Majority
Lewis Macdonald Scottish Labour 382
2007 - Seat Held 2003 Result - Scottish Labour

Aberdeen North
MSP Elected Party Majority
Brian Adam Scottish National Party 3,749
2007 - Seat Held 2003 Result - Scottish National Party

Aberdeen South
MSP Elected Party Majority
Nicol Stephen Scottish Liberal Democrats 2,732
2007 - Seat Held 2003 Result - Scottish Liberal Democrats

TAIL DOCKING OF DOGS IN SCOTLAND Posted Thursday, April 5, 2007
SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE

Environment and Rural Affairs Department Animal Health and Welfare Division

Pentland House
47 Robb's Loan Edinburgh EH 14 1 TY
Telephone: 0131-2446462 Fax: 0131-2446616
Ian .strachan@scotland.gsi.gov.uk http://www.scotland.gov.uk

Mr Alex Hogg Chairman
Scottish Gamekeepers' Association
PO Box 74777
PERTH
PH27YE

26th March 2007

Dear Alex

TAIL DOCKING OF DOGS IN SCOTLAND

From the 30th April 2007 it will be an offence to conduct tail docking of dogs, to permit the tail docking of dogs to take place or to take a dog from Scotland for the purpose of having its tail docked. It will not be an offence to bring a dog with a docked tail into Scotland, nor to be in possession of a "docked" dog in Scotland.
On 14th March 2007 the Scottish Parliament approved the Prohibited Procedures on Protected Animals (Exemptions) (Scotland) Regulations 2007. Scottish Ministers have now agreed a Commencement Order which will fully implement Section 20 of the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006 (the Act) from 30th April 2007. Section 20 of the Act makes it an offence for a person to carry out a procedure on an animal which interferes with the sensitive tissues or the bone structure of that animal unless the procedure is for medical treatment or has been specifically exempted by Scottish Ministers.

As the Prohibited Procedures on Protected Animals (Exemptions) (Scotland) Regulations 2007' did
not specify the tail docking of dogs as an exempted procedure, this means that it will be an offence for any person to dock or shorten the tail of any dog in Scotland from 30th April 2007, unless the tail removal is for medical treatment. In this context, medical treatment will permit the removal of a diseased or injured tail. It will also be an offence to take a dog from Scotland for the purpose of having the animal's tail docked.
The legislation in Scotland differs to the legislation which will apply in England and Wales and the legislation which presently applies in Northern Ireland. There is no prohibition on the tail docking of dogs in Northern Ireland by veterinary surgeons. However, it will be an offence to dock the tails of dogs in England and Wales, but an exemption will be made to allow veterinary surgeons to dock the tails of certified working dogs under 5 days of age.

The difference in the legislation between Scotland and the other parts of the UK has given rise to speculation that there could be a number of people who will take pregnant bitches out of Scotland to England, Wales or Ireland, where the dogs can give birth and then the puppies can have their tails legally docked. It is true that this is theoretically possible, as the definition of "animal" in the Act, specifically excludes an animal in its foetal or embryonic form.
However, if dogs were to be taken from Scotland for the purpose of having the tails of their puppies docked, to be then brought back to Scotland for sale, it is likely that the courts would consider this to be a journey in connection with an economic activity. As a consequence the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 on the protection of animals during transport would apply. The significance of this Regulation is that the animals must be "fit to travel" and Chapter 1 of Annex 1 of the Regulation states that pregnant females for whom 90% or more of the expected gestation period has already passed and females who have given birth in the previous week are not considered fit for transport. Thus if a dog were to be taken from Scotland to give birth, she would need to make the journey at least 6 days before the expected date of the birth and could not be transported back for 7 days following the birth.
In summary it will be an offence for any person, including a veterinary surgeon, to dock the tail of any puppy in Scotland from the 30th April 2007.
I hope this letter clarifies the position. However, please contact me if you have any questions about the provisions of the Act or its implementation.
Yours sincerely


Ian W Strachan
Head of Animal Welfare Branch

Posted Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Dear all
>> I have had more results back from the Moredun Institute.
>> 22 results came back positive for Squirrelpox antibodies, out of 30
> (taken between 28/01 and 05/03). All 22 samples were from areas where
> there has previously been evidence of grey squirrels carrying
> antibodies - Canonbie, Harelaw, Langholm, near Lockerbie and
> Rowanburn. The 2 from 'near Lockerbie' were from Dormont Estate,
> Dalton near Lockerbie. Whilst these are the first 2 from this
> particular estate I am not classing them as being in a 'new area'
> given that there have previously been positives on Kirkwood Estate
> which neighbours Dormont.
>
> This means that since the last batch of results in January we have
> jumped from 28 to 50 (!) seropositive grey squirrels..
>
> Drumlanrig Estate continues to return negative (clean) samples.
>
> A few more samples have been submitted from the Moffat area however
> many more are required to be sent in - please get in touch with me if
> you know of anyone in that area who could control and take blood
> samples from grey squirrels.
>>
> This brings south Scotland's total to 77 seropositive/positive grey
> squirrels. (50 in D&G and 27 in Scottish Borders).
>>
> 44.2% of grey squirrels in 'danger zone' of D&G test positive.
> (Danger zone = Lockerbie, Langholm, Canonbie areas)
>
> Those of you who are submitting blood samples - please note the following:
>> Samples should be submitted to:
>
> Dr Kim Willoughby, Virus Surveillance Unit, Moredun Research Institute,
> Pentland Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0PZ. The part in red is the only bit which has changed.
>> Sending off your blood samples
>>
> Packaging and posting of the samples needs to be done under the agreement we have with Royal Mail. This requires the tube(s) to be placed inside a bag and for this to then be wrapped in a cushioning material, such as kitchen roll. This should prevent the tube from breaking but if it does, the blood will still be collectable from the bag. Place the tube(s) in a 'Jiffy'envelope.
>> Lastly, a grid reference number must be included otherwise the lab will
> not
> process the sample. Please contact me if you require a grid reference.
>
> Traps, pox kits and training are available. Please contact me if you wish to participate in grey squirrel control.
>>
> Many thanks to everyone involved in grey squirrel control. As always, please pass this e-mail to anyone who may be interested in the contents.
>>
> Best wishes
>> Ann-Marie
>
> Ann-Marie MacMaster
>> Red Squirrel Conservation Officer for Dumfries & Galloway
>> Red Squirrels in South Scotland
>> Carlow House Locharbriggs Dumfries DG1 1QS
>> Tel: 01387 711804 Mobile: 07733 121837
>> ann-marie
> @red-squirrels.org.uk

Pride in the park Posted Thursday, February 15, 2007
PEOPLE living within the Cairngorms National Park will be experts on the area thanks to a number of new free courses being run by the Cairngorms National Park Authority (CNPA).


The CNPA is committed to working in partnership with the people living within the Park to achieve its four aims – conservation, sustainable use of resources, promotion of enjoyment and the sustainable development of the area’s communities. The Cairngorms Awareness and Pride project (CAP) will be able to realise both of those ambitions.

The project will see 20 courses being offered that will promote, teach and train in areas that are central to the Park’s aims and special qualities. Experts from a wide range of sectors, including agriculture, wildlife and landscape, will be brought in to lead each programme.

It will bring together as wide a cross section of the Park’s communities as possible so they can learn from one another, share good practice and discuss problems.

As well as learning a new skill, the individuals will gain a better understanding, knowledge and interest of the Park and its aims, its special qualities and how they can participate and be involved in the work that goes on within the area.

They will also be able to use their new skills and knowledge to help others, particularly visitors, have a better understanding, enjoyment and experience of the Park.

Claire Ross, Education and Inclusion Manager for the CNPA said: “This project promotes awareness and greater understanding of the Cairngorms National Park and why it is such a special area. It is giving the people living in the Park a sense of ownership, an understanding of the aims of the National Park and pride in their area.”

Kate Christie, Land Based Business Project Manager at the CNPA and the CAP Project Manager, said: “Cairngorms Awareness and Pride allows people to have their part in developing the Park and helping it become a place that everyone can feel involved with.

“What is exciting about this project is it will not only give people a number of new skills, but they will work alongside existing groups. It will also see the partnership ethos of the Park in action.”

CAP will consist of 20 courses for people of all ages living in the Park. They can take part in as many courses as they want.

The first programme, Leave No Trace/Minimum Impact, is due to take place on March 21st in Kincraig and March 22nd in Ballater. It will teach people how to respect the countryside, rivers and mountains and leave them as they find them.

A number of other courses have already been scheduled, including:

Woodfuel (April 26th)
Ticks and Lyme Disease (May 10th)
Pond Creation (May 29th)
Wildflower identification (May 20th)
Habitats of the Cairngorms (June 27th)
Landscape History of the Cairngorms (July 4th)
Wildlife Appreciation (November 7th)

Other programmes will be announced throughout the year, with details to appear in the local press.

Each course will last a day and up to 20 people will be able to take part. Assistance will be given with transport and child care.

There will also be after-course advice and support for those wishing to pursue their interest further.

The project costs £20,000 and is being funded by the CNPA and the Heritage Lottery Fund’s Awards for All programme, which offers grants to local groups.

An Awards for All spokesperson said: "The great thing about Awards for All is that it shows how a small amount of money can make the biggest difference to local communities. We are delighted to be awarding a grant of £10,000 to the Cairngorms National Park Authority. The award will help to increase the membership and most importantly ensure representation from all sectors of communities."

For more information about CAP or to apply for any of the courses please contact Kate Christie on 01479 873 535.

Ban on Tail Docking Posted Thursday, February 15, 2007
Davey Thomson, Geva Blackett and I, together with three veterinary surgeons had a meeting last week with Ross Finnie MSP, the Liberal Democrat Minister for Environment & Rural Development about exemptions from the mutilations ban.

The veterinary surgeons, who gave up their valuable time to express their concerns, spoke about their professional opinion on the necessity for certain breeds of working dogs to have their tails shortened as soon as possible after birth.

I am extremely angry at the news that the Minister, Ross Finnie has ignored the advice of working dog owners and vets in deciding to continue with his ban on shortening puppies’ tails.
The Minister has failed in his obligation to protect the welfare of our working dogs and condemned many breeds to a life of pain in his attempts to curry favour with animal rights activists. The Animal Health and Welfare Act is a sham!

The countryside will not forget and we must make sure politicians understand that by protesting at the ballot box on 3rd May and voting as tactically as necessary.

DAVID GRAYLING HAS NEW WEBSITE. Posted Monday, February 5, 2007
http://www.davidgraylingbooks.com

David Grayling, dealer in rare and out-of-print books on fieldsports and natural history, including big game hunting worldwide, has launched a new website on which a healthy proportion of his stock is listed and described.

A client wrote “I like the new web site very much, it’s very easy to use and has obviously been set up by an expert.”

David assures his clients, however, that he will continue to issue his familiar catalogues on various sporting subjects – “My clients buy books, they like the “feel” of books, including my traditional catalogues. Another client remarked – ‘I read your lists on the train travelling to my office; I don’t want to switch on a computer to see what you have when I get home, I have enough of that every day of my business life’. Many clients don’t have computers, and have no intention of buying one! Catalogues for them are essential. ”

Honda ATV Raffle 2006 Posted Friday, January 19, 2007
The Honda ATV, a TRX 350FM in green, was won by Mr Bill MacDonald of Aberdeenshire and was thrilled to hear that he was the lucky winner, he said that he never expected to win it. The ATV will be used at his local shoot of which he is a syndicate member. Mr MacDonald is also a member of the SGA. The second prize, an original painting by Elizabeth Halstead, a stalker returning home with a stag on a hill pony 'Coming Home to Auchallater' was won by Natasha George of Corgarff also in Aberdeenshire, her father is a Gamekeeper member of the SGA. Congratulations to both!
Thank you to everyone who purchased a ticket, a total amount of £8707 was raised which is fantastic. A huge thank you to Honda UK and to Elizabeth Halstead for their very generous donations!

Golden Eagles Posted Friday, October 6, 2006
Following the RSPB’s announcement that they were offering rewards to find the culprits of the deaths of 2 golden eagles in Scotland, Alex Hogg, Chairman of the Scottish Gamekeepers Association said:

“I would like to reiterate that the SGA condemns the use of poisons and supports all sensible measures to combat wildlife crime; we hope this reward will bring the perpetrator to justice.

As the RSPB have stated “Grouse shooting is very much a side issue for Glenfeshie. There is no commercial reason for somebody to think that killing an eagle would be a good idea for the estate."

Golden Eagles pose no threat whatsoever to shooting interests, so where are these carcasses coming from and why do these stories always appear around the grouse shooting season, a time of year when visiting shooters pay around £3,000 each per day into the rural economy?

Evidence is mounting from recent incidents that, for those with a grudge against sporting estates, the death of a few eagles appears misguidedly to be a small price to pay in return for ‘headline grabbing’. Carcasses must be DNA tested as a matter of course so that the bird’s origin can be determined and the truth behind these crimes uncovered.

We know that Scotland’s golden eagle population is healthy because SNH and RSPB have exported 60 young golden eagles to Ireland, with no guarantees of their survival once released over there. The golden eagle population in Scotland is supported by sporting estates encouraging deer stalkers to leave the carcasses of old animals and the gralloch on the hill for the eagles to feed on. Wildlife managers, such as our members, do not shout about successful nests because we want to protect these iconic birds from egg thieves and anyone else who might want to do harm.”



Media interest in the story was intense; SGA committee member Archie Dykes gave an exclusive interview to radio Scotland’s Grass Roots; SGA Chairman Alex Hogg gave interviews to BBC1 news and other committee members were interviewed by various newspapers including the P&J, Glasgow Herald, Daily Telegraph and the Guardian.

If you see any articles or wildlife issues, especially where attacks on gamekeeping are involved, please make sure you reply in person to the claims made. It is only by doing this that we can debunk the misinformation propagated by our opponents.

Scottish Country Sports Launches Survey Posted Monday, August 7, 2006
It is estimated that the value of country sports tourism to Scotland is in excess of £200m per year

The newly created Scottish Country Sports Tourism Group (SCSTG) has been established to look at the development of the country sports industry in Scotland for tourism. It aims to attract 50,000 new participants into Scottish Country sports over the next 10 years and position Scotland as the No 1 Country Sports Destination in the world.

Its first move is to carry out research in the form of a national survey into the number of commercial country sports providers operating in Scotland and the variety of sports they offer. The information will be used to modernise practices and create easier accessibility for a greater number of potential consumers. It will also bring benefits to the providers themselves by way of future marketing initiatives as well as to the wider economy.

Project Manager, Alistair Rutherford explains: “We can’t develop the industry without knowing who is involved with Country Sports in Scotland. Once we have collated responses from our survey we will be able to build a comprehensive database providing invaluable sector information on national practices and geographical and sport based opportunities. It offers us a tremendous resource on which to base future sector development plans and will offer providers on the database the opportunity to benefit from the SCSTG’s extensive marketing and future promotional initiatives.”

Ends.
For further information please contact...

Note for editors: The project has been piloted in Dumfries & Galloway, Angus and Ross & Cromarty where response levels were very positive, achieving greater than 30% return rate.

Having completed the pilot, the Survey will now be distributed across Scotland with the aim of having a working database by the start of 2007.

Alistair continues: “Scotland’s heritage, tradition, landscape and quality of sport give it untold advantages over most other destinations. The level of promotion and marketing that the industry receives both domestically and internationally is not on a par with the value of the sector.”

“In the UK there are well over 4 million country sports participants, with many more overseas including 38 million in the US. The industry generates in excess of £200M for the Scottish economy, mainly within rural and remote communities. We must therefore maximise our strengths and look to develop in other areas to ensure that existing consumers continually return and that new markets are attracted in to participate. We must also look at promoting and marketing Scotland much more heavily to capitalise on its reputation as a world class country sports destination.”
The Survey is available online at http://survey.cstgscotland.org.uk or the paper based version is available on request from the address below. Completed submissions are requested by 30th November 2006.

The national survey is supported by: Scottish Enterprise: VisitScoltand; Highlands and Islands Enterprise; Scottish Countryside Alliance Educational Trust; Association of Deer Management Group; The Scottish Gamekeepers Association; The Association of Salmon Fishery Boards, British Association for Shooting and Conservation; Scottish Rural Property Business Association and the Scottish Estates Business Group.


Alistair Rutherford
Scottish Country Sports Tourism Group
Croft Cottage
Trochery by Dunkeld
Perthshire
PH8 0DY

Tel: 01350 723226



CNPA Consultation on the Park's Plan Posted Wednesday, July 19, 2006
The Scottish Gamekeepers Association (SGA) is pleased to respond to the Cairngorms National Park Authorities (CNPA) consultation on the park’s plan.
The most important action for the CNPA to take, as a matter of urgency, is to commission an independent audit of all wildlife and habitat within the park so that a bench mark for success/future action can be created and measured. We urge the CNPA to take urgent action to put such investigations in place.
The CNPA must publicly recognise, and promote, that deer stalking/management and other sporting activities, such as fishing and game shooting, have been responsible for tailoring the properties within the park (at no cost to the taxpayer). The importance of their continuation in maintaining rural sustainability should be stressed as a priority.
The habitat on grouse moors and deer forests will have different characteristics and different socio/economic and biodiversity aims to that of unmanaged moorland; this should be recognised by government, statutory bodies and the public alike.
If we continue to reduce the deer herd within the park area (and its periphery) there will be a large reduction in quality stags for the sporting market - no sporting client wishes to come and shoot ‘spikers’ and the ever increasing numbers of young stags!
Bird friendly fencing is a simple and cheap option which allows for all interests to be protected and the CNPA should take this opportunity to lead the way in this innovative management method.
Under the current policy of increasingly heavy culls being carried out in many areas, there is no proper selection of stags and so there is no opportunity to allow young stags the chance to mature. For example, several estates marching with Glenfeshie are now loosing out on their market place in sporting stags as there are insufficient deer to go round and the quality of yesteryear has been shot out.
This same problem has become obvious in areas of the Lomond National Park where estates are reducing their stalking staff as there are not sufficient deer to maintain the fragile rural infrastructure.
A recent survey conducted by a major sporting estate shows the approximate tourist spend in Braemar Area per day to be:

Campers £5
Bus Tourists £40
Car Tourists £75
Bird Watchers £75
Salmon fishers £400
Deer Stalkers £600
Grouse Shooters £3,000

If the CNPA is to succeed in the statutory aims of:

· conserving and enhancing the natural and cultural heritage of the area.

· Promoting sustainable use of the natural resources of the area.

· Promoting understanding and enjoyment (including enjoyment in the form of recreation) of the special qualities of the area by the public.

· Promoting sustainable economic and social development of the area's communities (as laid down in The National Parks (Scotland) Act 2000),

a radical re-think of deer policy is needed. Our sporting estates’ vital role in the conservation of our endangered heather habitat should be encouraged with grouse moors and deer forests promoted as ‘Special Places’ for prolific and often endangered wildlife. The professional advice given in the above paragraphs should be heeded and acted upon – with wildlife and habitat audits being priority number one – in order to protect the cultural, regional and economic stability of the area. In short, political agendas should be replaced by common sense.

Priorities for Action
4.2.1 – There is no recognition that historical management has created the Park’s biodiversity and landscapes! Also there is no mention of resource provision to assist land managers in providing the required information etc. Is this section just an excuse for added bureaucracy (as exists in other UK national parks)?
‘Wildlife Partnerships’, for example, are little more than job creation schemes providing little or no substantial benefit. Mention is made of targeting raptor persecution, but what about helping identify some benefits of hosting raptors. At present it is all one way. No mention of Riparian issues and this should feature highly.

4.2.2 - This section would be more appropriately headed along the lines of "Developing Sustainable Grazing Management" – we are concerned that deer are singled out as THE significant grazer... Also, much of what is suggested is already being done!

OUTLINE ACTION PROGRAMME: Developing Sustainable Deer Management: Other than the spelling mistakes in this section of the consultation document, the SGA would like to point out that, under your section “Greater co-operation in marketing of sport and venison and wider take-up”, we have been asking DCS to co-operate on this issue for a long time and yet we are not included as a key partner...

4.2.4 – more provision should be made for visitors to understand the role field sports has played in the shaping of the landscape and wildlife; also more education (notice boards etc) explaining the work being carried out (stalking, muirburn, pest control etc); the legal requirement not to tamper with legal predator controls (snares, traps etc); the benefits of these activities to other flora and fauna. More hill phones should be made available so that access does not conflict with deer stalking/culling operations. Also, bylaw should be brought in to ensure that dogs are kept on short leads during the nesting/lambing season (April to August)

4.2.6 - Need to reinforce importance of lack of interference by central government/agencies. Should be remembered and recognised that field sports (fishing/stalking/shooting) are tourism too and therefore should be promoted as such some of the best field sports in the world are available within National Park, something we should be very proud of and should be recognised and promoted by the CNPA!

Additional Comments: We need hill tracks to extract deer, a study should be undertaken to identify the economic value (to shops, restaurants, hotels, B&Bs, garages etc as well as to estates and therefore to direct employment) of stalking, fishing and shooting to the CNP area. The paper appears slanted against deer and yet many locals and most tourists like to see deer and they should be valued and managed as the economic value they are!

Red Squirrels - Vote now Posted Monday, June 12, 2006
Please follow this link and vote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/5069276.stm

Murdo Fraser MEP picked up on the idea for saving Scotland’s endangered red squirrels after reading about the suggestion for a bounty in Alex Hogg’s column in the latest edition of the Scottish Gamekeeper”

DEFRA Approves F10 Disinfectant to Kill Avian Flu Posted Thursday, May 18, 2006
DEFRA’s advice for bird owners in the light of the current avian flu epidemic is to keep wild birds away from game birds and maintain strict biosecurity. Since HPAI doesn’t need close contact and can be transferred via faecal droppings from infected birds, it is vital to decontaminate everything that comes onto the surrounding land with an approved disinfectant.

F10, by Health and Hygiene, is a DEFRA-approved disinfectant that effectively kills Avian Influenza, and kills it quickly. F10SC disinfectants have been successfully tested against avian influenza viruses at a concentration of 1:500 with a contact time of only 10 minutes.

In addition to F10's killing ability, its user friendliness sets it apart from other products. It is available in a number of formats that are designed to treat the various pieces or equipment as well as people, in line with DEFRA’s recent advice that includes:

§ Clean overalls and footwear must be worn when entering poultry farms. Protective clothing and footwear should be removed and either cleansed and disinfected, laundered or disposed of after use.

§ Have pressure washers, brushes, hoses, water and an approved disinfectant available. Make sure they are used by visitors to clean vehicles, equipment and boots both before entry and on leaving.

§ Clean and disinfect all vehicles after each journey. If possible, do not use the same vehicles for transporting birds, feed, manure or other wastes.

§ Regularly clean and disinfect all crates, containers and other equipment before and after use. Do not move any equipment into different poultry buildings without cleaning and disinfecting it first. This also applies to injecting and dosing equipment.

As well as the Super Concentrate fluid, F10 comes in a “Ready to Use” disinfectant with Trigger Spray, F10 Wipes in a Dispensing Tub, Antiseptic Liquid Soap, Hand Gel, Degreaser and Cleaner. It can also be applied as a fog or fine spray to mist rooms or in vehicle spraying, or even administered to birds in their drinking water.

F10 has been given a ‘zero’ hazard rating by the EU. It is non-corrosive, non-toxic, non-irritating and aldehyde free so has no adverse effects on people, animals, equipment or surfaces.

A total spectrum disinfectant, F10 kills all types of bacteria, viruses, fungi and spores. It is also highly effective against other types of avian diseases including Newcastle Disease, IBD and Chlamydophilia.

It is no coincidence that so many countries around the world are importing F10 to handle their problems with animal diseases. On its website at www.healthandhygiene.net, Health and Hygiene provides serious evidence from independent research on F10 for download in addition to their F10 Game Bird Rearing User Guideline.

F10, by Health and Hygiene, is distributed in the UK by Garlands Ltd. For further information and details of your nearest stockist, please call 01827 383300 or email info@garlands.uk.com.

Photo's for the Picture Gallery needed Posted Monday, February 13, 2006
If you have had a great day and wish to tell other members about it, please send in a photograph and we will try to get it in the next issue of the Scottish Gamekeeper Magazine. Send your photo's to geva.blackett@btconnect.com

The Outdoor Access Code Posted Wednesday, December 22, 2004
The Outdoor Access Code Website www.outdooraccess-scotland.com is now live on the world wide web. This site is hosted by Scottish Natural Heritage to promote understanding of the Scottish Outdoor Access Code. It is where you can find out all you need to know about statutory rights, responsibilities, and how to mangage access.

New Crow Trap Signs prove to be a good catch. Posted Sunday, April 20, 2003
Due to increasing demand the SGA has had to order more Crow Trap signs to be made. Anyone attaching them to their crow traps, are finding them very effective in deterring people from tampering with legitimate crow cage traps.

The new crow trap signs are now available from the SGA.
The signs can be attached to your crow traps to inform the public why there is a need to kill crows etc. and that the trap is lawful under a general licence issued by the Scottish Executive, and must not be tampered with.
The traps are available from SGA headquarters and only cost £3.50 each (excl.P&P).
We would like to thank the Scottish Police Service and Sandy McConnachie (SGA Committee) for organising the signs for the SGA.

Historical European Visit by the SGA Posted Sunday, April 20, 2003
A delegation from the SGA, recently took some of its concerns directly into the European Union Headquarters in Brussels. The team consisted of our Chairman Alex Hogg, Vice Chairman Davey Thomson (who used “Shock & Awe” tactics by wearing the kilt), Committee member Bert Burnett and Geva Blackett.
They spoke to many MEPs from all the UKs political parties, the EU Parliament Vice Chairman Mr Ilkka Suominen, Representatives from FACE, ELO and the EU Commission.
Snaring and Trapping, Capercaillie, The Birds Directive, Land Reform and Conservation were just some of the numerous subjects discussed in the various meetings.
Alex Hogg said: "We must take our concerns to Europe, as decisions made there affect our livelihoods and the countryside we so cherish. We have immeasurable experience of wildlife management and must make sure they hear our concerns. This first visit by the SGA to the EU Parliament was a very important step and one which we are prepared to take whenever it is necessary.”


| Home | What We Do | Benefits of Our Work | Join | Contact Us | Forum |
| Raptor Problem | Raptor - Rebuttal | Raptor - Obstacles | Raptor Solutions | Reply to Langholm |
Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) - Bill
| Stage 1 | Additional Evidence | Justice & Home Affairs Committee | Rural Affairs Committee |